Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:30:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311161: privoxy: new backport for memory leak, please
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2005 12:53:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 29 05:53:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-fami-1-c28-p155.vtx.ch (mail.prolibre.com) [212.147.28.155]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcNHy-0007Kp-00; Sun, 29 May 2005 05:53:10 -0700
Received: by mail.prolibre.com (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id DAEC18981D; Sun, 29 May 2005 14:53:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Erik Rossen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: privoxy: new backport for memory leak, please
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 14:53:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: privoxy
Version: 3.0.2-4.backports.org.1
Severity: wishlist
I recently had a bit of trouble with Privoxy on some high-uptime servers
that slowly ate all available memory. If it is not too much trouble
could you please upload another backport of Privoxy to backports.org
that has bug #215911 corrected? The Privoxy package at backports.org
dates from September 2003.
Thanks in advance!
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hulk 2.4.27prolibre #1 SMP Fri Jan 28 16:21:25 CET 2005 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH
Versions of packages privoxy depends on:
ii adduser 3.47 Add and remove users and groups
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpcre3 3.4-1.1 Philip Hazel's Perl Compatible Reg
ii logrotate 3.5.9-8 Log rotation utility
ii sysvinit 2.84-2woody1 System-V like init.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 311161-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 16:30:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 09:30:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luv.spinnaker.de [194.8.203.54] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dp7MV-0007nb-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:30:31 -0700
Received: from besan.sail.spinnaker.de (besan.sail.spinnaker.de [192.168.42.7])
by luv.spinnaker.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F6689450;
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:30:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by besan.sail.spinnaker.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CFBFA2A102; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:30:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:30:27 +0200
From: Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Erik Rossen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#311161: privoxy: new backport for memory leak, please
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi Erik!
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Erik Rossen wrote:
> Package: privoxy
> Version: 3.0.2-4.backports.org.1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I recently had a bit of trouble with Privoxy on some high-uptime servers
> that slowly ate all available memory. If it is not too much trouble
> could you please upload another backport of Privoxy to backports.org
> that has bug #215911 corrected? The Privoxy package at backports.org
> dates from September 2003.
I fear that the official Debian bug tracking system is the wrong
recipient for this bug report. So I forwarded it to the maintainers
of backports.org.
The Debian stable distribution (3.1 AKA sarge) is already released and
contains 3.0.3-3, so I close this bug report now.
Tschoeeee
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
