Your message dated Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:27:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285390: udev: Prompts for conffile which I have not
modified
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2004 00:14:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 16:14:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx2.stlawu.edu [199.0.76.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cddqu-0003jf-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 16:14:12 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by dummy.domain.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDD11231A8;
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx2.stlawu.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mx1.stlawu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
with ESMTP id 13602-16; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cyberia.stlawu.edu (cyberia.stlawu.edu [10.32.122.39])
by mx2.stlawu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40F11231A3;
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:13:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by cyberia.stlawu.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CddqP-0004pH-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:13:41 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udev: Prompts for conffile which I have not modified
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:13:41 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at stlawu.edu
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: udev
Version: 0.048-2
Severity: normal
--- /etc/udev/scripts/ide-devfs.sh 2004-10-22 10:49:39.000000000
-0400
+++ /etc/udev/scripts/ide-devfs.sh.dpkg-new 2004-12-09
13:30:37.000000000 -0500
Although I have not modified this conffile, I am prompted during an
upgrade, undermining the whole point of using a conffile.
Preparing to replace udev 0.042-1 (using .../archives/udev_0.048-2_i386.deb) ...
The 3 changes made are of the form:
MEDIA=`cat /proc/ide/${1}/media`
...
-echo ide/host${HOST}/bus${BUS}/target${TARGET}/lun0/cd
cdroms/cdrom`get_dev_number $1 cdrom`
+echo ide/host${HOST}/bus${BUS}/target${TARGET}/lun0/cd
cdroms/cdrom`get_dev_number $1 cdrom` ${MEDIA}
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13 Nov 2 09:37 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9Y
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.10 Debian configuration management sy
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-16 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86-5 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
-- debconf information:
udev/devfs-warning:
* udev/reboot-warning:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285390-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 17:28:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 03 10:28:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dp8GD-0000bR-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:28:06 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 942EB5F7CA; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:28:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id B96991C79F; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:27:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:27:40 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#285390: udev: Prompts for conffile which I have not modified
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Dec 13, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package does not modify the file, probably the warning is caused the
> code which handles upgrades from versions < 0.046-4, which needs to
Closing.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCyCAMFGfw2OHuP7ERAtdNAJ4nIHgzA9mYM7zecLpV4XSpN0fDlgCeIwQx
0/0FjTJfNmzYgDZLPeVNxhE=
=BGa7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9UV9rz0O2dU/yYYn--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
