Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:30:44 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line sablevm has been removed from Debian, closing #366197
has caused the Debian Bug report #366197,
regarding sablevm: typo in man page: "patch" for "path"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
366197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366197
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sablevm
Version: 1.13-1
Severity: minor
The sablevm(1) man page has a typo:
"sablevm.boot.library.path
changes native libraries patch which are used by boot classpath"
"patch" should be "path".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages sablevm depends on:
ii java-common 0.23 Base of all Java packages
ii libc6 2.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libsablevm1 1.13-1 Free implementation of JVM second
ii unzip 5.52-8 De-archiver for .zip files
Versions of packages sablevm recommends:
ii free-java-sdk 1.0-1 Complete Java SDK environment cons
ii jikes 1:1.22-4 Fast Java compiler adhering to lan
pn libgnujaxp-java <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.13-1.4+rm
The sablevm package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/508369 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
