Your message dated Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:36:20 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Done: [homebank] dependency on librsvg2-common
has caused the Debian Bug report #503622,
regarding [homebank] dependency on librsvg2-common
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
503622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503622
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: homebank
Version: 3.8-1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Without installed librsvg2-common is Homebank nearly unsuable because
it does not load any graphic for menus.
At the moment is librsvg2-common only recommended.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64
Debian Release: lenny/sid
500 wicd apt.wicd.net
500 testing gd.tuwien.ac.at
--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=============================-+-============
homebank-data (>= 3.8-1) | 3.8-1
libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0) | 1.22.0-1
libc6 (>= 2.7-1) | 2.7-14
libcairo2 (>= 1.4.0) | 1.6.4-6.1
libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0) | 2.16.6-1
libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0) | 2.12.11-4
libofx4 | 1:0.9.0-3
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0) | 1.20.5-3
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: homebank
Version: 3.8-1
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
O.K.
I close this bugreport. At least can someone found answer here, why his
installation of Homebank look so bad.
--- End Message ---
