Your message dated Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:50:40 +0100
with message-id <20081225225040.22bff...@busgosu>
and subject line closing sylpheed-gtk1 bugs (removed package)
has caused the Debian Bug report #397268,
regarding sylpheed-gtk1: ..concatenates email messages, possible mail loss case.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
397268: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397268
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sylpheed-gtk1
Version: 1.0.6-4
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
...found this in my email box:
a...@a45:/tmp $ cat ~/Mail/z-inbox/9
>From [email protected] Mon Nov 06 00:52:27 2006
Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to: a...@localhost
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:52:27 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=a45.fmb.no)
by a45.fmb.no with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1Ggrms-0003ot-ON
for a...@localhost; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:52:26 +0100
X-T2-Real-To: <[email protected]>
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 []
Received: from popw.c2i.net [212.247.156.2]
by a45.fmb.no with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.4 polling popw.c2i.net account
[email protected])
for <a...@localhost> (single-drop); Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:52:26 +0100
(CET)
Received: from vishnu.netfilter.org ([213.95.27.115] verified)
by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.12)
with ESMTPS id 218296695 for [email protected]; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:39:42 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=vishnu.netfilter.org)
by vishnu.netfilter.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian))
id 1GgsCn-00045C-M4; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:19:13 +0100
Received: from [210.193.162.198] (helo=mail.uniqueworld.net)
by vishnu.netfilter.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian))
id 1GgsC7-0003yS-GZ
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:18:34 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:38:26 +1100
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: PPTP issue
Thread-Index: AccBM0czQxPKqTA7QGmZB2Vc38/wngAAB42Q
From: "Jason Neurohr" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
Subject: PPTP issue
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion and user questions <netfilter.lists.netfilter.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]
Hello, trying to connect to pptp server through linux iptables firewall.
I have the ip_conntrack_pptp and ip_nat_pptp modules loaded. Anyone know
what the below means and how to fix it?
20:10:28.569271 IP pptpserver.pptp > xxxxxxxx.4131: . ack 349 win 8820
20:10:28.569322 IP xxxxxxxx > pptpserver: GREv1, call 0, seq 0, ack 1,
length 38: LCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 0, length 20
20:10:28.569471 IP xxxxxxxx > pptpserver: GREv1, call 0, seq 1, length
45: LCP, Conf-Ack (0x02), id 34, length 31
20:10:28.574955 IP pptpserver > xxxxxxxx: GREv1, call 4131, ack 1,
no-payload, length 12
20:10:30.569253 IP xxxxxxxx > pptpserver: GREv1, call 0, seq 2, length
34: LCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 20
20:10:30.902135 IP pptpserver > xxxxxxxx: GREv1, call 4131, ack 2,
no-payload, length 12
20:10:31.036259 IP pptpserver > xxxxxxxx: GREv1, call 4131, seq 2,
length 34: LCP, Conf-Ack (0x02), id 1, length 20
20:10:31.074693 IP xxxxxxxx.4131 > pptpserver.pptp: P 349:373(24) ack
189 win 65347: pptp CTRL_MSGTYPE=3DSLI PEER_CALL_ID(0)
SEND_ACCM(0x000a0000) RECV_ACCM(0xffffffff)
20:10:31.168891 IP pptpserver.pptp > xxxxxxxx.4131: . ack 373 win 8820
20:10:31.175664 IP xxxxxxxx > pptpserver: GREv1, call 0, ack 2,
no-payload, length 12
20:10:31.180676 IP pptpserver > xxxxxxxx: GREv1, call 4131, seq 3,
length 48: CHAP, Challenge (0x01), id 2, Value
bf1e69be064b99fd81c1810a9d05b0e5, Name 192.168.10.22
20:10:31.219988 IP xxxxxxxx > pptpserver: GREv1, call 0, seq 3, ack 3,
length 55: CHAP, Response (0x02), id 2, Value
50e507db3f5f8330dc3622846e7ffbb3, Name aaa__aaaaaaa
20:10:31.249508 IP pptpserver > xxxxxxxx: GREv1, call 4131, seq 4, ack
3, length 64: CHAP, Fail (0x04), id 2, Msg CHAP authentication failure,
unit 578938[|chap]
20:10:31.250493 IP pptpserver > xxxxxxxx: GREv1, call 4131, seq 5,
length 20: LCP, Term-Request (0x05), id 35, length 6
20:10:31.294624 IP xxxxxxxx.4131 > pptpserver.pptp: P 373:397(24) ack
189 win 65347: pptp CTRL_MSGTYPE=3DSLI PEER_CALL_ID(0)
SEND_ACCM(0xffffffff) RECV_ACCM(0xffffffff)
20:10:31.296630 IP xxxxxxxx > pptpserver: GREv1, call 0,?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:flightgear-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Olaf Flebbe
> Sent: 05 November 2006 22:43
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Cc: Mathias Fr=F6hlich
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] OSG Performance on WIndows
> =
> Hi,
> =
> while double (and triple ;-) - checking everthing I discovered that I
> had a prerelease of Mathias overhauled AC3D Loader in my 3rdparty.zip.
> You may find an update on my website. Sadly, this doesn't change
> framerate.
> =
> Uncommenting sceneView->update() in render.cxx gives a performance jump
> from 60FPS to 80FPS. (plib was 100FPS). Traversing the scenegraph seems
> to
>From <>(________-000000027686) Sun Nov 05 23:42:30 2006
X-T2-Real-To: <[email protected]>
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 []
Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225] verified)
by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.12)
with ESMTP id 319274666 for [email protected]; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 00:42:30 +0100
Received: from sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net (unknown [10.3.1.94])
by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7A9471394F; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 15:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92]
helo=mail.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1GgrcW-0004zn-UI for [email protected];
Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:41:44 -0800
Received: from mx-out.libertysurf.net ([213.36.80.91]
helo=mail.libertysurf.net)
by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1GgrcV-00068s-RF
for [email protected];
Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:41:46 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (83.152.172.182) by mail.libertysurf.net
(7.3.117.3)
id 453E0DFA00235B19 for [email protected];
Mon, 6 Nov 2006 00:41:33 +0100
From: Didier Fabert <[email protected]>
To: FlightGear developers discussions <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 00:54:43 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <004401c70132$00d6acd0$3f2a6...@main>
In-Reply-To: <004401c70132$00d6acd0$3f2a6...@main>
X-Face:
${\rfQxXuc9:i|=VyIfo[@,<:["rIrT":no.N-<`e[$`ct...@o8-tw<=?utf-8?q?N=5F=263=60=24CFoGW=3Dw4=0A=098?=>o-l>aTs=vF]KUG;
\~#p>(5Ti-VoC@
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Report problems to
http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] plib svn
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
Reply-To: FlightGear developers discussions
<[email protected]>
List-Id: FlightGear developers discussions
<flightgear-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=flightgear-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]
my recent experience learn me that plib svn cannot be used on an amd64.
i suppose since cvs became svn.
cvs version give me a runable executable svn not. i thought osg is the guilty
but it's plib.
--
Didier Fabert
[email protected]
KFreeFlight project : A FlightGear GUI-Frontend designed for KDE users
http://kfreeflight.sourceforge.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages sylpheed-gtk1 depends on:
ii gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-31 imaging library for use with gtk
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcompfaceg1 1:1.5.2-3 Compress/decompress images for mai
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-14 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgpg-error0 1.4-1 library for common error values an
ii libgpgme11 1.1.2-2 GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libldap2 2.1.30-13.1 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpisock9 0.12.1-5 library for communicating with a P
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8c-3 SSL shared libraries
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-2 X11 client-side library
ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxi6 1:1.0.1-3 X11 Input extension library
Versions of packages sylpheed-gtk1 recommends:
ii aspell-en 6.0-0-5.1 English dictionary for GNU Aspell
ii metamail 2.7-52 implementation of MIME
ii sylpheed-claws-scripts 1.0.5-5 Helper scripts for Sylpheed and Sy
ii sylpheed-gtk1-i18n 1.0.6-4 Locale data for Sylpheed (i18n sup
ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-3 100 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-100dpi-transcoded 1:1.0.0-3 100 dpi fonts for X (transcoded fr
ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-3 75 dpi fonts for X
ii xfonts-75dpi-transcoded 1:1.0.0-3 75 dpi fonts for X (transcoded fro
-- no debconf information
...I use these 2 to get my mail:
a...@a45:/tmp $ COLUMNS=80 dpkg -l fetchmail procmail
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii fetchmail 6.3.4-7 SSL enabled POP3, APOP, IMAP mail gatherer/f
ii procmail 3.22-16 Versatile e-mail processor
a...@a45:/tmp $
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi there,
You're receiving this mail because time ago (probably years) filed a
bug against sylpheed-gtk1 package in Debian's Bug Tracking System (or
against sylpheed package before it was a GTK2 application which ended
assigned to sylpheed-gk1 package).
Anyway, the sylpheed-gtk1 package has been removed from Debian now, hence
I'm closing all the bugs related to it. Most of them are old, but, it may
be possible some of these are still within modern sylpheed.
If you're using sylpheed package right now, would be very helpful to check
if the bug being closed now still applies to sylpheed. If not using
sylpheed, well, you can still check it anyway if you want... :)
If bug doesn't apply to current sylpheed you're done.
If the current sylpheed package (2.6.0, in experimental) still has the bug,
please, file a _NEW_ bug report for sylpheed (unless you have already done
so in the past, of course). You may refer the old bug number if you want in
the description, but error details and reproduction method must be relevant
for sylpheed.
Sorry for the long mail and thanks for reporting.
Seasonal greetings where applicable,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Don't relax! It's only your tension that's holding you together.»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
