Your message dated Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:32:06 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#509425: fixed in gdm 2.20.7-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #509425,
regarding gdm: broken defaults.conf on i386
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
509425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gdm
Version: 2.20.7-4
Severity: normal

Hi,

It looks like /usr/share/gdm/defaults.conf on i386 sets StandardXServer
to /usr/X11R6/bin/X instead of /usr/bin/X.  For some reason the amd64
package is ok.  It would be nice to fix this beore we get rid of the
/usr/X11R6/bin symlink.

Cheers,
Julien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gdm
Source-Version: 2.20.7-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gdm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gdm_2.20.7-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gdm/gdm_2.20.7-5.diff.gz
gdm_2.20.7-5.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gdm/gdm_2.20.7-5.dsc
gdm_2.20.7-5_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/g/gdm/gdm_2.20.7-5_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Minier <[email protected]> (supplier of updated gdm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:55:12 +0100
Source: gdm
Binary: gdm
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.20.7-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Loic Minier <[email protected]>
Description: 
 gdm        - GNOME Display Manager
Closes: 509425
Changes: 
 gdm (2.20.7-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Don't update-rc.d remove / install during first configuration.
   * Use lt-nl when comparing versions instead of checking $2.
   * Build-depend on xserver-xorg for the X_SERVER detection logic to work; it
     would be more elegant to add an AC_ARG_WITH to skip the detection and
     avoid the bdep, but the 2.20 branch isn't the long term focus so this is a
     good stop gap measure; closes: #509425.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 e9e00a9efa15a6a8d88529f7b5afa3499003dda8 1631 gdm_2.20.7-5.dsc
 21d431b3b6be411ed295687605ae984421328a1b 539542 gdm_2.20.7-5.diff.gz
 f3aca4a2b8a17fae7441f098b7a83f9dfcbcb05b 4852962 gdm_2.20.7-5_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3cc490eaccb70c21afe1cbabe7d8854c3d765c31486f36394ebcfb21803e9b16 1631 
gdm_2.20.7-5.dsc
 17b5c7c51edf15d459ac89c3eeeb8601715ba21130496abdbd7a54895f74f629 539542 
gdm_2.20.7-5.diff.gz
 e5a2ed0d13d046f7e44c44bbcfd491366fb4979250ecc7f75f65954984918cfd 4852962 
gdm_2.20.7-5_amd64.deb
Files: 
 5bf0a9ba9172ca188908eb70f2dd896d 1631 gnome optional gdm_2.20.7-5.dsc
 839cf8915963b4b1cc9ff2216dd107a7 539542 gnome optional gdm_2.20.7-5.diff.gz
 66a22a8af729dda21cc051e6003885c3 4852962 gnome optional gdm_2.20.7-5_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkl1pkYACgkQ4VUX8isJIMA3YQCfbMo5DkrW/gqyKNWFLMqkUBaz
QYwAoKMNWiVh47a5v28eYbV1KP0fuSNl
=EIPM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to