Your message dated Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317235: Shouldn't aspell depend on aspell-bin version
0.60.3-1 or greater?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2005 22:29:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 06 15:29:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-47-144.nas.com (debian1.loaner.com) [66.114.47.144]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqIO9-0000FB-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:29:05 -0700
Received: from kingsley by debian1.loaner.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DqINe-0007xl-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:28:34 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Shouldn't aspell depend on aspell-bin version 0.60.3-1 or greater?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.43
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:28:34 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Kingsley G. Morse Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: aspell
Version: 0.60.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Thanks for maintaining Debian's aspell package.
I like it and use it.
I noticed that bug report #307481 said that aspell
depends on the latest version of aspell-bin, and
indeed upgrading to version 0.60.3-1 of aspell-bin
fixed
Symbol `_ZTVN7acommon6StringE' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
relocation error: aspell: undefined symbol:
_ZNK7acommon6Config4haveENS_10ParmStringE
Shouldn't aspell depend on version 0.60.3-1 or
greater of aspell-bin?
Thanks,
Kingsley
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages aspell depends on:
ii aspell-bin 0.60.3-1 GNU Aspell standalone spell-check
ii aspell-en [aspell6-dictionary 6.0-0-3 English dictionary for GNU Aspell
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 317235-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2005 15:31:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 07 08:31:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.25]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqYLn-0004KG-00; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:31:43 -0700
Received: (qmail 29813 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2005 15:31:41 -0000
Received: from dsl254-022-219.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO
sirius.bignachos.com) ([216.254.22.219])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by mail23.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 7 Jul 2005 15:31:41 -0000
Received: from scabbers (unknown [192.168.1.10])
by sirius.bignachos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2953D535B2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by scabbers (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DA17910C047; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:32:20 -0700
From: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#317235: Shouldn't aspell depend on aspell-bin version 0.60.3-1
or greater?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:06:33PM -0700, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> To avoid the bug reported in #307481, whose report
> can be found at
Yeah, but that only applies to "aspell-bin" and not "aspell".
In any case, this bug is now obsolete with the latest upload of aspell
sitting in the NEW queue, since I've now merged "aspell-bin" into
"aspell". So, closing...
--
Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to
pretend to like each other.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
