Your message dated Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:47:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316440: fixed in policycoreutils 1.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2005 22:30:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 30 15:30:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-119-132.arcor-ip.net (gleep.earth.sol)
[82.83.119.132]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Do7Y4-00084A-00; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:30:20 -0700
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Do7Y3-0004AO-6u
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:30:19 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: build-depends not strict enough
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:30:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: policycoreutils
Version: 1.24-1
Severity: important
policycoreutils failed to build on my m68k box, as on all other arches. It
has since been tried again on s390 (unlike checkpolicy, the rebuild on ia64
failed), where it succeeded to build. When looking at those build-logs, it
seems that the successsful build used libsepol1-dev 1.6-1, while the failed
builds used libsepol1-dev 1.4-1. Your build-depends say libsepol1-dev (>=
1.4-1), maybe you should change that to >= 1.6-1. Alternatively you could
ask for the build to be retried on all remaining arches, which would
probably work. But if libsepol1-dev 1.4-1 is buggy, the cleaner solution
would be to tighten the build-deps, IMHO.
Christian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316440-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2005 18:51:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 07 11:51:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqbTP-0006eb-00; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:51:47 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DqbPQ-00011r-00; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:47:40 -0400
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#316440: fixed in policycoreutils 1.24-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:47:40 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: policycoreutils
Source-Version: 1.24-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
policycoreutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
policycoreutils_1.24-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.24-2.diff.gz
policycoreutils_1.24-2.dsc
to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.24-2.dsc
policycoreutils_1.24-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.24-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated policycoreutils
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:11:01 -0500
Source: policycoreutils
Binary: policycoreutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.24-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
policycoreutils - SELinux core policy utilities
Closes: 316440
Changes:
policycoreutils (1.24-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* use /etc/adduser.conf as authoritative for the starting UID, and
otherwise change genhomedircon to match Debian practice. This had
worked while Russell Coker maintained this package, but this patch was
lost in transition.
* Bug fix: "FTBFS: build-depends not strict enough", thanks to Christian
T. Steigies (Closes: #316440).
Files:
0f53b4e16ceaf6b5676372f7963cb25f 659 utils optional policycoreutils_1.24-2.dsc
f17d968e9fde672b8f76abcc8fd29dc0 38082 utils optional
policycoreutils_1.24-2.diff.gz
916ceb0aacd0d76e2ac41b6a5573c32a 96742 utils optional
policycoreutils_1.24-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCzXMBIbrau78kQkwRAomFAJ9efFVh84GAkbPuHbxEFUDj7B34BwCfUkBa
geTIa5IFpLwG18VlXZws7WM=
=XUBe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
