Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:00:44 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line sfs has been removed from Debian, closing #141983
has caused the Debian Bug report #141983,
regarding sfs-client: SFS should implement some kind of UID/GID mapping
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
141983: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=141983
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sfs-client
Version: 1:0.5k-5
Severity: wishlist

It would be great if SFS could map UIDs (and GIDs) between client and
server. As SFS can be used to share files between different admistrative
domains, it's often impossible to implement identical UIDs on clients and
servers, so some kind of configurable mapping would be very helpful.

Jan

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux sirith 2.4.19-pre5-ac3 #1 Mon Apr 8 14:19:21 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de...@euro

Versions of packages sfs-client depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-4    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgmp3                       4.0.1-1.1  Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2        1:2.95.4-5 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  sfs-common                    1:0.5k-5   Self-Certifying File System common
ii  sfs-lib                       1:0.5k-5   Self-Certifying File System server



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1.1+rm

The sfs package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/507036 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to