Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:00:45 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line sfs has been removed from Debian, closing #162872
has caused the Debian Bug report #162872,
regarding sfs-dev: Installed header file includes config.h.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
162872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=162872
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sfs-dev
Version: 1:0.6-2
Severity: minor
Moi!
/usr/include/sfs-0.6/sysconf.h contains
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include <config.h>
#endif /* HAVE_CONFIG_H */
and I doubt the authors intended to include the config of each package
that links against libsfs. Indeed it's causing problems during the
build of libpam-sfs, which in part is the package's own fault, but then
I think including config.h from an installed header file is a bad idea
in general. Simply doesn't make sense.
Regards,
Daniel.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux antares 2.4.19 #1 SMP Tue Sep 24 13:17:49 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
Versions of packages sfs-dev depends on:
ii libc6-dev 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii libgmp3-dev 4.0.1-3 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii sfs-common 1:0.6-2 Self-Certifying File System common
ii sfs-lib 1:0.6-2 Self-Certifying File System shared
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1.1+rm
The sfs package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/507036 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
