Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:00:48 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line sfs has been removed from Debian, closing #469372
has caused the Debian Bug report #469372,
regarding sfs-client/sfs-server: Please add LSB formatted dependency info in 
init.d script
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
469372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469372
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package:  sfs-client sfs-server
Version:  1:0.8-0+pre20050819.1-2
Tags:     patch
User:     [email protected]
Usertags: missing-dependency

To be able to check boot script order, and also to be able to start
boot scripts in parallel, it is important to know the dependencies of
the various boot scripts.  The Linux Software Base specifies a init.d
header file format useful for this purpose, and adding such header to
the anacron init.d script would make it possible for me to use this
information to check the current sequence and to speed up the debian
boot.

I am working on a system to update the boot sequence based on these
dependencies, and would like see this as the default in Lenny.
Because of this, it is nice if the dependencies was updated quickly.

<URL:http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-generic/LSB-generic/initscrcomconv.html>
documents the LSB header format.  Some debian notes are available from
<URL:http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts> and
<URL:http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot>.

Here is a patch to document the dependencies.  I hope this is correct.

diff -ur sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1.orig/debian/rc.sfs-client 
sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1/debian/rc.sfs-client
--- sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1.orig/debian/rc.sfs-client   2008-03-04 
21:58:57.000000000 +0100
+++ sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1/debian/rc.sfs-client        2008-03-04 
22:00:02.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
 #! /bin/sh
+### BEGIN INIT INFO
+# Provides:          sfs-client
+# Required-Start:    $remote_fs $syslog
+# Required-Stop:     $remote_fs $syslog
+# Default-Start:     2 3 4 5
+# Default-Stop:      0 1 6
+### END INIT INFO
 #
 # skeleton     example file to build /etc/init.d/ scripts.
 #              This file should be used to construct scripts for /etc/init.d.
diff -ur sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1.orig/debian/rc.sfs-server 
sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1/debian/rc.sfs-server
--- sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1.orig/debian/rc.sfs-server   2008-03-04 
21:58:57.000000000 +0100
+++ sfs-0.8-0+pre20060720.1/debian/rc.sfs-server        2008-03-04 
22:00:10.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
 #!/bin/sh
+### BEGIN INIT INFO
+# Provides:          sfs-server
+# Required-Start:    $remote_fs $syslog
+# Required-Stop:     $remote_fs $syslog
+# Default-Start:     2 3 4 5
+# Default-Stop:      0 1 6
+### END INIT INFO
 #
 # skeleton     example file to build /etc/init.d/ scripts.
 #              This file should be used to construct scripts for /etc/init.d.

As the stop script do not seem to do much except killing the daemon,
that task might be better left to the sendsigs script in runlevel 0
and 6, to speed up shutdown.  If this is indeed the case, I recommend
removing 0 and 6 from the Default-Stop list.

Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20060720.1-1.1+rm

The sfs package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/507036 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to