Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:58:50 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line xmove has been removed from Debian, closing #442125
has caused the Debian Bug report #442125,
regarding xmove assert: SaveVisuals() couldn't find the default visual
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
442125: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=442125
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmove
Version: 2.0beta2-8
Severity: important
$ xmove
Implementing MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 user authentication
XMove 2.0 ready.
(next line comes after starting xterm and waiting a bit)
xmove assert: SaveVisuals() couldn't find the default visual
$
$ DISPLAY=:1 xterm
(sleeps a bit)
X connection to localhost:1.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
$
This bug is probably specific to amd64, nvidia or something else as it
would have been found by others, too. Is it reproducible at all?
Helmut
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages xmove depends on:
ii libc6 2.6.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7 X11 client-side library
xmove recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0beta2-8+rm
The xmove package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/486772 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
