Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:06:21 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#516571: gdb on SPARC fails with ""regcache.c:175:
internal-error: register_size:" assertion failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #516571,
regarding gdb on SPARC fails with ""regcache.c:175: internal-error:
register_size:" assertion failure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
516571: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gdb
Version: 6.4.90.dfsg-1
Severity: normal
While trying to debug a program on Debian/SPARC I loaded the binary and
a core-dump into gdb. A simple "bt" then caused the following error
(after displaying part of the backtrace, but not all of it):
/build/buildd/gdb-6.4.90.dfsg/gdb/regcache.c:175: internal-error:
register_size: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < (NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS)'
failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
I have seen this happen with different binaries and core-files.
A sample set of input files can be provided.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers oldstable
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-sparc64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gdb depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13etch9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libncurses5 5.5-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline5 5.2-2 GNU readline and history libraries
gdb recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:45:23PM +0100, Henrik Størner wrote:
> But I think you're right that it is fixed in Lenny, and it is ok with
> me if you close this bug.
Thanks for checking!
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--- End Message ---
