Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:39:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnupg: please put bug reporting address in man page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 01:40:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 18:40:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaOP5-0006If-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 18:40:19 -0700
Received: from ip018.subnet65.gci-net.com ([127.0.0.1]) [216.183.65.18]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaOP4-00005i-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 20:40:18 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnupg: please put bug reporting address in man page
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 18:40:18 -0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: normal
i have always been confused about whether bts is only for
debian-specific bugs or for passing along to upstream, but other
package maintainers sometimes act as if it is the former. unless they
are all wrong, could you put the reporting address in the man page?
if not, maybe even say so.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11--from-2.6.9-proc-config-and-menuconfig
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-6 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libldap2 2.1.30-8 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.10a-9 userspace USB programming library
ii makedev 2.3.1-77 creates device files in /dev
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2005 19:57:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 13 12:57:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from warp.os9.nl [145.99.250.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsnMd-00012A-00; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:57:52 -0700
Received: from darwin.os9.nl (darwin.os9.nl [145.99.250.219])
by warp.os9.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12643E6A6C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:57:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by darwin.os9.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5AD4313924; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:57:50 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: gnupg: please put bug reporting address in man page
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gyyCD3jiFUjQPoWA9Fhk"
Organization: Squirrelmail Development Team
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:39:13 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-gyyCD3jiFUjQPoWA9Fhk
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> i have always been confused about whether bts is only for
> debian-specific bugs or for passing along to upstream, but other
> package maintainers sometimes act as if it is the former. unless they
> are all wrong, could you put the reporting address in the man page?
> if not, maybe even say so.
You can report all bugs in Debian packages to Debian, and the maintainer
will forward relevant bugs to upstream. This is not a problem specific
to the gnupg package.
Thijs
--=-gyyCD3jiFUjQPoWA9Fhk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBC1W3hJdKMxZV9WM8RArNlAKDVf2fzMJk72jnwKJt19N0nUyISuwCfbpJX
RIEph6ZQZiXghOztxtfs+fg=
=i5nR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-gyyCD3jiFUjQPoWA9Fhk--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
