Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:30:17 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gtk+1.2 has been removed from Debian, closing #156304
has caused the Debian Bug report #156304,
regarding gtk_calendar_get_date: clicking on a "disabled" date doesn't work as
it should
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
156304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=156304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jpilot
Version: 0.99.2-2
Severity: wishlist
In j-pilot's calendar module, you always see several full weeks,
with some days in the subsequent and previous months printed in
grey. When you click on such days, the calendar just jumps one
months ahead or back, but the selected day of the month remains the
same. It would be nice if this could be changed so that (1) the
month view changes, and (2) the day the user actually clicked on is
selected.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux yoda 2.4.17 #28 Wed May 1 13:15:42 CEST 2002 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages jpilot depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-4 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-11 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets for X
ii libpisock4 0.9.5.0-8 Libraries for communicating with a Pilot PDA
ii pilot-link 0.9.5.0-8 Tools to communicate with a 3COM Pilot PDA o
ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.10-18.1+rm
The gtk+1.2 package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/520441 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
