Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:30:40 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gtk+1.2 has been removed from Debian, closing #407438
has caused the Debian Bug report #407438,
regarding libgtk1.2-common: Japanese characters are not displayed correctly in
gtk1.x apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
407438: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=407438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgtk1.2-common
Version: 1.2.10-18
Severity: important
Tags: patch l10n
This bug is look like Bug#382879. Please put attached "gtkrc.ja.utf-8"
file in your package as "/etc/gtk/gtkrc.ja.utf-8".
The applications that depends gtk1.2 show broken characters when
LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 (Japanese language, UTF-8 encoding).
We cannot use over 20 applications. (bombermaze, gnotepad+, xmms, etc.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-amd64
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-- no debconf information
style "gtk-default-ja-utf8" {
fontset =
"-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--14-100-100-100-p-76-iso8859-1,\
-ricoh-ms
mincho-medium-r-normal--14-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0208.1983-0,\
-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--14-*-*-*-*-*-jisx0208.1983-0,\
*-r-*"
}
class "GtkWidget" style "gtk-default-ja-utf8"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.10-18.1+rm
The gtk+1.2 package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/520441 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
