Your message dated Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:06:36 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Reportbug-maint] Bug#496781: Bug#496781: reportbug:
Creates bad signatures when signing utf8 text
has caused the Debian Bug report #496781,
regarding reportbug: Creates bad signatures when signing utf8 text
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
496781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.45
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Looks like reportbug creates invalid signatures when the bug report
includes characters outside us-ascii. Such reports should probably be
encoded as quoted-printable before being signed. I guess this report
itself will demonstrate the problem since it will include my realname
in .reportbugrc contents below...
So, I might just as well sign it with
Thanks,
Bjørn
- -- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/bjorn/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "3.2"
mode standard
ui text
realname "Bjørn Mork"
email "[email protected]"
sign gpg
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (650, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 0.7.14+b1 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii python 2.5.2-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-central 0.6.8 register and build utility for Pyt
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
ii debconf-utils 1.5.22 debconf utilities
pn debsums <none> (no description available)
pn dlocate <none> (no description available)
ii file 4.25-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii gnupg 1.4.9-3 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
pn python-urwid <none> (no description available)
ii sendmail-bin [mail-transport- 8.14.3-5 powerful, efficient, and scalable
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAki1PqkACgkQ10rqkowbIsnabQCeMb/pE/12vKHER0ikp6DwjIlQ
8D8AoI/zCcIFvekTOPlSRHyieHme0NjY
=/1Ni
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
2009/4/20 Bjørn Mork <[email protected]>:
> Sandro Tosi <[email protected]> writes:
>>> Feel free to downgrade this bug to wishlist, or close it
>>> with wontfix if you find that most appropriate.
>>
>> Well, I'd rather come to an agreement with out about what to do. From
>> the analysis you did, it seems this bug is in the external programs
>> used by reportbug, and not in reportbug itself, so I'm kind of
>> thinking about closing it, what do you think?
>
> Agreed. Please close.
Doing now, with this email.
> I've tried to recreate the bug without success since my last reply.
> Which indicates that it might just have been a configuration error
> somewhere on my side.
>
> Thanks for your attention,
You're welcome, and thanks for the report!
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
