Your message dated Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:20:27 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#523292: mirror listing update for ftp.no.debian.org
has caused the Debian Bug report #523292,
regarding mirror listing update for ftp.no.debian.org: contact info
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
523292: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=523292
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mirrors
Severity: minor
Submission-Type: update
Site: ftp.no.debian.org
Aliases: ftp.uninett.no
Aliases: ftp.uio.no
Type: leaf
Archive-architecture: amd64 i386 ia64 powerpc sparc
Archive-ftp: /debian/
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-rsync: debian/
CDImage-ftp: /debian-cd/
CDImage-rsync: debian-cd/
IPv6: no
Archive-upstream: ftp.se.debian.org
CDImage-upstream: ftp.se.debian.org
Updates: push
Maintainer: Morten Werner Forsbring <[email protected]>
Country: NO Norway
Location: Oslo, Norway
Sponsor: USIT, University of Oslo, Norway http://www.usit.uio.no/
Comment: Sponsor #2: Uninett (http://www.uninett.no/)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
retitle 523292 mirror listing update for ftp.no.debian.org: contact info
thanks
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 07:36:35PM +0200, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote:
> Simon Paillard <[email protected]> writes:
> >> Site: ftp.no.debian.org
[..]
> >> Archive-architecture: amd64 i386 ia64 powerpc sparc
> >
> > Would it be possible to host all architectures ?
> > http://debian.org/mirror/size will give you an idea.
> > It is prefered for officials ftp.CC.debian.org.
>
> I'm working on it, will get back to you with an updated arch-list.
Thanks, I will close this bug which concerns only the update of contact
information.
Just use the form to advertise the add of new architectures.
> > [..]
> > Sponsors updated, and previous admin removed ?
> > (That was the purpose of this update ?)
>
> Previous admin could be removed, yes. And correct again, that was the
> purpose of the update.
Already updated.
Best regards.
--
Simon Paillard
--- End Message ---
