Your message dated Fri, 1 May 2009 09:23:39 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line oleo has been removed from Debian, closing #393979
has caused the Debian Bug report #393979,
regarding Wrong permissions on /usr/share/doc/oleo/examples
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
393979: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393979
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oleo
Version: 1.99.16-8.1
Severity: normal


Hello,

$ ls -ld /usr/share/doc/oleo/examples/
drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 Oct 18 21:02 /usr/share/doc/oleo/examples/

With the executable bit set, this directory would be more usfull for
common users.

Thanks.

@+,
        Fab


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages oleo depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.6.ds1-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1                      1:4.1.1-16  GCC support library
ii  libncurses5                  5.5-4       Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libplot2c2                   2.4.1-15    The GNU plotutils libraries
ii  libstdc++6                   4.1.1-16    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxdb1                      1.2.0-7     xbase compatible C++ class library

oleo recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.99.16-11+rm

The oleo package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/526212 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to