Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:37:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2001 20:56:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 24 14:56:37 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (whitehorse.blackwire.com) [199.247.156.30]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Ic9E-0007dN-00; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:56:36 -0600
Received: (qmail 8191 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Dec 2001 20:45:12 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Peter Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-dev: dpkg-scanpackages doesn't scan *.udeb files
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.142
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.142
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 12:45:12 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.9.18
Severity: normal
If you have a bunch of .udeb files lying around, dpkg-scanpackages
just won't even look at them, making it difficult to generate
a Packages list for these.
Peter
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux whitehorse 2.4.7 #1 Fri Jul 27 22:25:49 PDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages dpkg-dev depends on:
ii binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3-3 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpio 2.4.2-39 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii make 3.79.1-10 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii patch 2.5.4-6 Apply a diff file to an original
ii perl [perl5] 5.6.1-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-modules 5.6.1-6 Core Perl modules.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 126382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 17:37:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 10:37:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DuD51-00062E-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:37:31 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DuD4y-0007kc-HL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:37:29 +0200
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:37:28 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This bug was actually fixed back in 1.10.17
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
