Your message dated Mon, 11 May 2009 19:07:08 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line ppmtofb has been removed from Debian, closing #500173
has caused the Debian Bug report #500173,
regarding python 2.5 warning when running fbview
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
500173: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ppmtofb
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
fbview has only one problem with python 2.5 that I've seen in testing
it:
/usr/bin/fbview:286: SyntaxWarning: name 'VERBOSE' is assigned to before global
declaration
global VERBOSE
The attached patch fixes that. Then fixing #385209 should be a simple matter
of changing the python conflict to not conflict with version 2.5.
--
see shy jo
--- fbview.py~ 2008-09-25 14:23:08.000000000 -0400
+++ fbview.py 2008-09-25 14:23:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
# . Added filter for pbm->pgm
# Defaults - can be overridden in /etc/fbview.conf or ~/.fbview.conf
+global VERBOSE
VERBOSE = 1 # Set to 1 for informative messages
NOCLEANUP = 0 # Set to 1 to keep the generated files around
@@ -278,10 +279,8 @@
elif option[0] == '--no-center':
center = 0
elif option[0] in ('-v', '--verbose'):
- global VERBOSE
VERBOSE = 1
elif option[0] in ('-q', '--quiet'):
- global VERBOSE
VERBOSE = 0
elif option[0] in ('-V', '--ppmtofb-verbose'):
ppmtofb_verbose = 1
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.32-0.1+rm
The ppmtofb package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/518906 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
