Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:07:19 +0530
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#524910: doesn't seem to be a splashy
bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #524910,
regarding acpid: init.d script returns 1 even in case of success
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
524910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524910
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: acpid
Version: 1.0.8-7
Severity: important
Installation of acpid fails because the post-install script returns 1.
This in turn is caused by /etc/init.d/acpid that returns 1 even in case of
success
(i.e. the script reports [OK], but returns 1).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages acpid depends on:
ii libc6 2.9-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii lsb-base 3.2-22 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii module-init-tools 3.7-pre9-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
Versions of packages acpid recommends:
ii acpi-support-base 0.109-11 scripts for handling base ACPI eve
acpid suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry Michael.
It seems to be working right now. I think it was a stupidity at my end, I ran
it without the proper privileges. :-(
Ritesh
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 21:45:24 you wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:27:33AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I think this isn't a splashy bug.
>
> I'm pretty sure that what you're describing is different form the original
> bug report.
>
> > + invoke-rc.d acpid force-reload
> > Reloading ACPI services...No /usr/sbin/acpid found running; none killed.
> > invoke-rc.d: initscript acpid, action "force-reload" failed.
>
> Hmm, this works for me. Does a ps show /usr/sbin/acpid running on your
> system? With the unchanged init script it should.
>
> With you change however, you have to rely on the PATH being set so
> start-stop-daemon finds acpid to start it.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
