Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:49:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301633: is this bug fixed in the latest version of cacti?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 11:43:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 03:43:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.treesign.com [217.17.192.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFWAk-00075f-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 03:43:14 -0800
Received: from strider.tquas.lab (p213.54.146.248.tisdip.tiscali.de
[213.54.146.248])
(authenticated)
by www.treesign.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2RBhBV19107
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:43:12 +0200
Received: from tom by strider.tquas.lab with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DFWAb-0003r0-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:43:05 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Quas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cacti: RRDTool parsing problems
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:43:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Thomas Quas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6c-5
Severity: important
I'm using net-snmp and cacti to report my machine's usage statistics. However,
I can't seem to make network traffic grpahs work.
$ snmpwalk -v 1 -c public strider interface
IF-MIB::ifNumber.0 = INTEGER: 4
IF-MIB::ifIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1
IF-MIB::ifIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2
IF-MIB::ifIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3
IF-MIB::ifIndex.4 = INTEGER: 4
[snip]
works, so my SNMP configuration looks correct.
Also, I can get memory and CPU usage grpahs out of Cacti.
Going to Console->Graph Management, I can select my 'Localhost - Traffic
- 192.168.16.100 (eth0)' graph, which uses the 'Interface - Traffic
(bytes/sec, Total Bandwidth)' template
I turn on graph debug mode, and all I see is:
RRDTool Says:
ERROR: can't parse ':MAX:Maximum\:%8.2lf %s'
-tom
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages cacti depends on:
ii apache2 2.0.53-5 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2] 2.0.53-5 traditional model for Apache2
ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libapache2-mod-php4 4:4.3.10-9 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii libphp-adodb 4.52-1 The 'adodb' database abstraction l
ii logrotate 3.7-2 Log rotation utility
ii mysql-client 4.0.24-2 mysql database client binaries
ii php4 4:4.3.10-9 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii php4-cli 4:4.3.10-9 command-line interpreter for the p
ii php4-mysql 4:4.3.10-9 MySQL module for php4
ii php4-snmp 4:4.3.10-9 SNMP module for php4
ii rrdtool 1.0.49-1 Time-series data storage and displ
ii snmp 5.1.2-6 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii ucf 1.14 Update Configuration File: preserv
ii wwwconfig-common 0.0.42 Debian web auto configuration
-- debconf information:
* cacti/username: cacti
* cacti/mysql_server: localhost
* cacti/webserver: Apache2
cacti/upgrade_warning:
* cacti/database: cacti
cacti/mismatch:
cacti/save_rootpw: true
cacti/root_mysql: root
* cacti/no_automagic:
cacti/purge_db: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 16:49:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 09:49:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net)
[66.92.235.113]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvHlL-0007Je-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:49:39 -0700
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B064815849; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:49:07 -0400
From: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: julien tayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Quas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#301633: is this bug fixed in the latest version of cacti?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hi julien, thomas,
thanks for following up with me. =20
julien: i'm not convinced that you need to run/chown all that stuff
as root... my guess is that somehow during debugging something
changed ownership of something to root and broke everything until
it ran as root. if everything (logs and rras) is owned by www-data and
the cronjob is run as www-data it *should* work, unless there's some
php setting that i don't know enough about preventing it.
but anyway, since thomas has confirmed that the problem is gone for
him, i'll close the bug. if you'd like to open up a seperate report
about the permissions stuff, julien, feel free to go ahead and do so.
sean
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFC3oCDynjLPm522B0RAp7pAJ98BAMupRokgSZvAu+9lcNPNaXdFgCY2MAX
j/FkQAkXtoUzL0fz9q/seA==
=/aaG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
