Your message dated Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:14:35 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#525310: pdfsam-console won't start (missing required
file)
has caused the Debian Bug report #525310,
regarding pdfsam-console won't start (missing required file)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
525310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pdfsam
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ pdfsam-console
: Missing required file: /usr/share/pdfsam/lib//pdfsam-console-2.0.1e.jar
Combined with #521585, this makes the pdfsam package in
Lenny utterly useless, unless I am mistaken. How did this
get into the distribution?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages pdfsam depends on:
ii java-gcj-compat [java2-runt 1.0.80-1 Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii libdom4j-java 1.6.1+dfsg-3 flexible XML framework for Java
ii libitext-java 2.1.4-1 Java Library to create and manipul
ii libjaxen-java 1.1.1-3 Java XPath engine
ii libjgoodies-looks-java 2.2.1-1 library with Swing look&feel imple
ii liblog4j1.2-java 1.2.15-4 Logging library for java
ii sun-java6-jre [java2-runtim 6-13-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime Environment (
pdfsam recommends no packages.
pdfsam suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Torsten
Werner<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that is the same problem as in bug #521585 and it has been
> fixed in version 1.1.2-1 which is in testing now. May you check that,
> please?
I am closing this bug report now because I did not get any feedback.
Please reopen it with more information if necessary.
Cheers,
Torsten
--- End Message ---
