Your message dated Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:52:42 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#532107: blueman: Provide gnome-bluetooth (not
bluez-gnome)
has caused the Debian Bug report #532107,
regarding blueman: Provide gnome-bluetooth (not bluez-gnome)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
532107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532107
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: blueman
Version: 1.10-2
Severity: important
It seems bluez-gnome was renamed to gnome-bluetooth, and the new package
conflicts with the old one.
So if this package provides the features of gnome-bluetooth (and does
not conflict with it) then the provides stanza should be adjusted.
Currently, blueman can only be installed if gnome-bluetooth is removed.
- Jonas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-rc7-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
gnome-bluetooth is not a new name for bluez-gnome (actually bluez-gnome
has once been known as gnome-bluetooth), but a causeless fork.
You could read about it in one of the main developers' blog:
http://www.hadess.net/2009/02/we-have-fork.html
I have no idea where it came from, but I guess it's related to a dispute
within the developer team.
It looks like the new gnome-bluetooth will outspace bluez-gnome, but at
the moment both are alive and I don't see any reason to change blueman's
(superior to both by the way ;-)) provide clause.
Let's just await the issue.
--- End Message ---
