Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:53:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2002 07:15:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 13 01:15:57 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-84-238-144.adsl.xs4all.nl (thinkpad) [213.84.238.144]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Mk3A-000387-00; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:15:56 -0600
Received: from master by thinkpad with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18Mk2e-0006Av-00; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:15:24 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:15:24 +0100
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: thttpd: Cannot change port setting in Debconf
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.9
Sender: Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.6 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: thttpd
Version: 2.23beta1-1
Severity: normal
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:34:19AM +0200, Yotam Rubin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:17:33PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> At the time of the configuration, apache was still running, so I
>> took another port temporarily and wanted to change it later with
>> dpkg-reconfigure, but it won't ask that question again :(
> This is because a port conflict no longer exists, causing the
> configuration script to believe that all is configured. You could of
> course modify /etc/thttpd/thttpd.conf to your own
> needs. Unfortunately, the changes will be overwritten every time you
> upgrade thttpd. This warrants a bug of its own.
Oh, and it didn't even configure thttpd for port 81, by the way:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep -i port= /etc/thttpd/thttpd.conf
port=80
I had a look at the postint script: Apache wasn't running anymore when
the postinst script ran, and the postint script checks again if the
port is occupied. If it isn't, it just ignores the debconf question:
if [ -n "`$NETSTAT -plut | awk '{print $4}' | grep www`" ]; then
db_get thttpd/port_prob
if [ "$RET" = "Specify an alternative port" ]; then
db_get thttpd/select_port
cat $CONFFILE | sed "s/port=[0-9]*/port=$RET/g" > $CONFFILE.temp
cp $CONFFILE.temp $CONFFILE
rm -f $CONFFILE.temp
fi
fi
Well, I get the idea. The reason you asked to choose another port
disappeared. But it certainly breaks the principle of least surprise:
If the user was required to choose a port, he certainly expects thttpd
to follow his or her choice.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thinkpad 2.4.19 #1 sam nov 2 21:07:31 CET 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages thttpd depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.19 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii logrotate 3.6.5-2 Log rotation utility
-- debconf information:
* thttpd/port_prob_dsc:
* thttpd/chroot: true
* thttpd/port_prob: Specify an alternative port
* thttpd/select_port: 81
thttpd/input_prob_dsc:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172879-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2005 15:53:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 08:53:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from panthera-systems.net [213.239.209.134]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DwinJ-0001W2-00; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:53:38 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (217-162-105-182.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.105.182])
by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691482DC012
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:51:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:53:34 +0200
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Panthera Systems
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Since the last revision, there are no longer parts of debconf-messages
necessary.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
