Your message dated Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:32:01 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line fixed spelling errors in binutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #395434,
regarding binutils: spelling errors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
395434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395434
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: binutils
Version: 2.17-3
Severity: minor
I spotted some spelling errors in manpages,
manpage: /usr/share/man/man1/ld.1.gz
errors: preceeded -> proceeded
exececutables -> executables
Charateristics -> Characteristics
conjuction -> conjunction
source: ld/ld.texinfo
manpage: /usr/share/man/man1/nm.1.gz
error: transistions -> transitions
source: binutils/doc/binutils.texi
manpage: /usr/share/man/man1/objdump.1.gz
error: mneumonic -> mnemonic
source: binutils/doc/binutils.texi
occurs in include/opcode/ChangeLog too
manpage: /usr/share/man/man1/readelf.1.gz
error: specifiying -> specifying
source: binutils/doc/binutils.texi
You might want to spellcheck everything, I might have missed some.
Thanks,
--
Matt Taggart
[email protected]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.19.1-1
--- End Message ---
