Your message dated Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:21:53 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: binutils-doc: missing texinfo version in build-depends
has caused the Debian Bug report #223278,
regarding binutils-doc: missing texinfo version in build-depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
223278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=223278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: binutils-doc
Version: 2.14.90.0.6-5
Severity: normal
Building binutils from source on stable leaves one with a binutils-doc
package that, when installed, does not configure:
Setting up binutils-doc (2.14.90.0.6-5) ...
No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info: unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up
dpkg: error processing binutils-doc (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
binutils-doc
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
E: Failed to process build dependencies
Upgrading texinfo from 4.1-2 (normal version on stable) to 4.6-1
before building binutils solves this. As there doesn't seem to be any
intermediate texinfo version around, binutils should probably contain
Build-Depends: texinfo (>= 4.6-1)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pika 2.4.21 #1 Sun Aug 17 13:05:46 BST 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
oldstable has texinfo 4.8.dfsg.1-4, so we don"t need this anymore
--- End Message ---
