Your message dated Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:41:53 +0200
with message-id <1247733713.27181.0.ca...@miria>
and subject line Re: Bug#509728: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#509728: Bug#509728: 
xfce4-xkb-plugin: breaks the second layout on certain combinations
has caused the Debian Bug report #509728,
regarding xfce4-xkb-plugin: breaks the second layout on certain combinations
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
509728: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfce4-xkb-plugin
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: important

Hello,

If I have a combination like "de,gb,ro" in xorg conf, after switching 
layouts the second (and only the second) one will be broken, as in some 
keys will behave as if AltGr is pressed [for example "l" will generate 
"ł" (lstroke)].

Strangely this doesn't happen if "us" is the first layout, even with the 
"intl" variant (which seems to be more similar to "de" and "gb").

Also using setxkbmap will work around this issue, but then the plugin 
stops working completely (maybe this should be a separate bug).

Please contact me if you need more info.

Regards,
Andrei

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xfce4-xkb-plugin depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0                   1.22.0-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                         2.7-16     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2                     1.6.4-7    The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1                2.6.0-3    generic font configuration library
ii  libglib2.0-0                  2.16.6-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0                   2.12.11-4  The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0                 1.20.5-3   Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libx11-6                      2:1.1.5-2  X11 client-side library
ii  libxcursor1                   1:1.1.9-1  X cursor management library
ii  libxext6                      2:1.0.4-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfce4util4                 4.4.2-3    Utility functions library for Xfce
ii  libxfcegui4-4                 4.4.2-4    Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4
ii  libxfixes3                    1:4.0.3-2  X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii  libxi6                        2:1.1.4-1  X11 Input extension library
ii  libxinerama1                  2:1.0.3-2  X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxrandr2                    2:1.2.3-1  X11 RandR extension library
ii  libxrender1                   1:0.9.4-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xfce4-panel                   4.4.2-6    The Xfce4 desktop environment pane

xfce4-xkb-plugin recommends no packages.

xfce4-xkb-plugin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On jeu, 2009-07-16 at 11:37 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Thu,16.Jul.09, 07:52:26, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On ven, 2009-01-02 at 14:31 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > If you could retry without ro involved, it'd be nice.
> > > 
> > > I guess it wasn't particularly obvious from my report, but I can 
> > > reproduce the bug with "de,gb" only.
> > 
> > Mhmh, xfce4-xkb-plugin now use libxklavier. Is that bug still present
> > with 0.5.3.2-1 or not?
> 
> No, I guess it can be closed.

Nice, thanks :)
-- 
Yves-Alexis



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to