Your message dated Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:20:52 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line ipmasq has been removed from Debian, closing #368637
has caused the Debian Bug report #368637,
regarding I79ident.def: iptables Invalid Argument
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
368637: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368637
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ipmasq
Version: 4.0.2
Severity: normal


The I79ident.def file, when using netfilter, tries to use the REJECT
target in the PREROUTING chain.  This target is valid only in the INPUT,
FORWARD and OUTPUT chains.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages ipmasq depends on:
ii  debconf                       1.4.30.13  Debian configuration management sy
ii  ipchains                      1.3.10-15  Network firewalling for Linux 2.2.
ii  iptables                      1.2.11-10  Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis

-- debconf information:
* ipmasq/start: true
  ipmasq/external-rules-moved: true
* ipmasq/start-location: After network interfaces are brought up
  ipmasq/dpkg-conffiles:
  ipmasq/ppp-turn-off:
* ipmasq/ppp-turn-on:
  ipmasq/move-ipmasq.rules: true
* ipmasq/ppp-recompute: false
  ipmasq/old-ipmasq.conf: true
  ipmasq/old-rc.boot-file: true


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.0.8-7+rm

The ipmasq package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/538384 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to