Your message dated Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:17:37 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gspca has been removed from Debian, closing #500908
has caused the Debian Bug report #500908,
regarding gspca-source: Fails to build on a custom kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
500908: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500908
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gspca-source
Version: 01.00.20-1
Severity: normal
An extract from 'make-kpkg modules':
------------------------------------------------------------
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
fakeroot /usr/bin/make -w -f debian/rules kdist_clean kdist_config
binary-modules
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/modules/spca5xx clean
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
rm -r -f drivers/usb/*.o drivers/usb/.spcadecoder.o.cmd \
drivers/usb/.spca5xx.o.cmd *.o *.ko *.mod.* .[a-z]* core *.i
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
for templ in ; do \
cp $templ `echo $templ | sed -e 's/_KVERS_/2.6.26/g'` ; \
done
for templ in `ls debian/*.modules.in` ; do \
test -e ${templ%.modules.in}.backup || cp ${templ%.modules.in}
${templ%.modules.in}.backup 2>/dev/null || true; \
sed -e 's/##KVERS##/2.6.26/g ;s/#KVERS#/2.6.26/g ; s/_KVERS_/2.6.26/g ;
s/##KDREV##/amaryllis.6/g ; s/#KDREV#/amaryllis.6/g ; s/_KDREV_/amaryllis.6/g
' < $templ > ${templ%.modules.in}; \
done
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
# Build the module
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/modules/spca5xx KERNEL_VERSION=2.6.26
KERNELDIR=/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
Building SPCA5XX driver for 2.5/2.6 kernel.
Remember: you must have read/write access to your kernel source tree.
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26 SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/spca5xx
CC=gcc-4.3 modules
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26'
scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in
"/usr/src/modules/spca5xx/Makefile". Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS. Stop.
make[4]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/spca5xx] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26'
make[3]: *** [default] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
make[2]: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
make[1]: *** [kdist_build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/spca5xx'
Module /usr/src/modules/spca5xx failed.
Perhaps /usr/src/modules/spca5xx does not understand --rootcmd?
If you see messages that indicate that it is not
in fact being built as root, please file a bug
against /usr/src/modules/spca5xx.
Hit return to Continue?
------------------------------------------------------------
Please let me know if you need more information.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (50, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gspca-source depends on:
ii bzip2 1.0.5-1 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii debhelper 7.0.17 helper programs for debian/rules
ii module-assistant 0.10.11.0 tool to make module package creati
gspca-source recommends no packages.
Versions of packages gspca-source suggests:
ii kernel-package 11.001-0.1 A utility for building Linux kerne
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 01.00.20-1+rm
The gspca package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/519463 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
