Your message dated Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:47:36 -0500 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: Bug#492006: ftbfs: restorecond depends on inotify (Etch backport) has caused the Debian Bug report #492006, regarding ftbfs: restorecond depends on inotify (Etch backport) to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 492006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492006 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: policycoreutils Version: 2.0.49-3 I was trying to backport policycoreutils to Etch, where sys/inotify.h is not present (due to an old glibc). The Makefile says: ifeq (${INOTIFYH}, /usr/include/sys/inotify.h) SUBDIRS += restorecond endif i.e. restorecond isn't being built and installed on Etch. The build fails here: chmod 0755 /usr/src/debian/build/policycoreutils-2.0.49/debian/policycoreutils/etc/init.d/policycoreutils chmod: cannot access `/usr/src/debian/build/policycoreutils-2.0.49/debian/policycoreutils/etc/init.d/policycoreutils': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [debian/stamp/install/policycoreutils] Error 1 It would be nice to be able to build this package on Etch, even if it does not include restorecond.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, With the release of Lenny, etch backporting has become less of an issue. manoj -- The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank. Scotty Manoj Srivastava <[email protected]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--- End Message ---
