Your message dated Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:58:56 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#543872: readahead-fedora: call to update-rc.d is broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #545533,
regarding mention the need of CONFIG_AUDIT=y more loudly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
545533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: readahead-fedora
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: important
Setting up readahead-fedora (1.5.0-2) ...
update-rc.d: error: start|stop arguments not terminated by "."
usage: update-rc.d [-n] [-f] <basename> remove
update-rc.d [-n] <basename> defaults [NN | SS KK]
update-rc.d [-n] <basename> start|stop NN runlvl [runlvl] [...] .
update-rc.d [-n] <basename> disable|enable [S|2|3|4|5]
-n: not really
-f: force
The disable|enable API is not stable and might change in the future.
dpkg: error processing readahead-fedora (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-rc7 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages readahead-fedora depends on:
ii e2fslibs 1.41.9-1 ext2/ext3/ext4 file system librari
ii libaudit0 1.7.13-1 Dynamic library for security audit
ii libblkid1 2.16-3 block device id library
ii libc6 2.9-25 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
readahead-fedora recommends no packages.
readahead-fedora suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tuesday 01 September 2009 18:03:31 Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > of "make sure you have CONFIG_AUDIT=y in your running kernel config" as
> > stock Debian kernels have it enabled and I expect people building their
> > own kernels to know what they are disabling.
>
> I disable *everything* and enable only the necessary things I need for my
> laptop. I detest those thousand-modules-dist-kernels, brrr. Seriously, that
> is something that should be written somewhere.
And as a matter of fact it *is* documented in readahead-collector. Would have
expected you to take a look at the man pages before giving me an example of
one.
Regards,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--- End Message ---
