Your message dated Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:46:56 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: please don't use altenatives in Enhances
has caused the Debian Bug report #526501,
regarding please don't use altenatives in Enhances
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
526501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lsdb
Version: 0.11-10
User: [email protected]
Usertags: edos-relation-warning
Hi,
your package contains an Enhances with an alternative:
mew | mew-beta
Policy does not allow this: Section 7.1 of the policy gives a list of
control file fields that may contain alternatives, and Enhances is
not among them.
What you should use here is a colon-separated list of packages. A
line
Enhances: a, b
means that your package has the potential of enhancing a, and it also
has the potential of enhancing b. it does not state anything about
a and b being installed together or not. This is consistent with the
use of colon-separated package lists in other control fields. E.g.,
Conflicts: a, b
means that your package conflicts with a, and it also conflicts with b,
independent of the question whether both of a and b are installed, or only
one of them.
-Ralf
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11-10
this bug is gone since the lsdb package does not have any more
Enhances field.
-Ralf.
--- End Message ---
