Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:26:13 +0200
with message-id
<[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#546866: aptitude: reverse self-conflicts listed as
reverse self-depends
has caused the Debian Bug report #546866,
regarding aptitude: reverse self-conflicts listed as reverse self-depends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
546866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546866
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.11.11-1
The newly-introduced nilfs-tools package shows the following display,
which at first glance seems completely false in the revdeps section - it
looks like it mistakenly takes some info from the Conflicts field to forge
a strange-looking revdep:
--\ Conflicts (1)
--- nilfs2-tools (< 2.0.14-3)
--\ Replaces (1)
--- nilfs2-tools
--\ Packages which depend on nilfs-tools (1)
--\ Depends (1)
p nilfs2-tools 2.0.14-3 0
unstable
--\ Versions of nilfs-tools (1)
p 2.0.14-3 0
unstable
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> On 2009-09-16 10:02 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
>> --\ Packages which depend on nilfs-tools (1)
>> --\ Depends (1)
>> p nilfs2-tools 2.0.14-3 0
> ^
>
> Note the highlighted "2" above, nilfs2-tools != nilfs-tools. There is
> no self-conflict or self-depends here.
Woops, sorry :(
--- End Message ---