Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:42:14 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package straw has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #226120,
regarding straw: opml export file really could use a DOCTYPE Declaration
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
226120: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=226120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: straw
Version: 0.21.1-2
Severity: normal
It's come to my attention that the opml file which straw exports doesn't
have a DOCTYPE Declaration header item. While this apparently is not
(yet) required in XML, I believe it is more than desirable to have.
mlview, FI, will complain about the lack of it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.4.20 #2 Wed Jun 11 19:32:40 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages straw depends on:
ii python 2.3.2-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python2.3 2.3.2-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python2.3-adns 1.0.0-5 A Python 2.3 interface to the asyn
ii python2.3-egenix-mxdatetime 2.0.4-2 Date and time handling routines fo
ii python2.3-glade2 2.0.0-2 GTK+ bindings: Glade support
ii python2.3-gnome2 2.0.0-5 Python bindings for GNOME 2
ii python2.3-gtk2 2.0.0-2 Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.27-0.1+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/226120 in Debian BTS
against the package straw. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/549078. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
