Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:56:06 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package gcrontab has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #207935,
regarding gcrontab: best way to edit the crontab
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
207935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=207935
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcrontab
Version: 0.6.6-8
Severity: wishlist
I think Gcrontab should run <crontab -l> to get a copy of the crontab,
then allow the user to edit it, and then save it and run <crontab -e
$tmpfile> when the user is done. This would be an effective way to make
Gcrontab a wrapper around the <crontab> program.
If Gcrontab would work on <argv[1]> instead of
</var/spool/cron/crontabs/$user> everything else above could be
accomplished with a shell script, which I'd be willing to contribute.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux zarg 2.2.20 #1 Fri Jun 20 20:11:20 UTC 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcrontab depends on:
ii cron 3.0pl1-72 management of regular background p
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-4 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-11 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8.0-4+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/207935 in Debian BTS
against the package gcrontab. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/549602. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
