Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:09:41 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package doc-gnome-hig has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #204109,
regarding doc-gnome-hig: Where to place preferences check menu items
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
204109: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204109
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: doc-gnome-hig
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: normal
It is unclear where to place menu items which duplicate (for fast
access) parts or the preerences dialog box.
A typical example is "Word Wrap" check menu item.
Should it be placed in the Edit menu together with "Preferences" menu item?
Seems a very unsuitable place as it clutters Edit menu with
strange-to-be-here items.
In my opinion in such the case we should create separate Settings menu
where these items (together with "Preferences" item moved from "Edit" menu)
will reside.
But what to do if there are only one menu item
duplicating-a-part-of-preferences dialog? In this case if we will follow my
above suggestion we would have 2 items Edit menu which contradicts to the
rule >=3 items in a menu. In this case (of one such item) I suggest to
leave "Preferences" in "Edit" menu, and place this
fast-access-to-a-preference item directly above it (without separator
between it and "Preferences" item).
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.0-3+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/204109 in Debian BTS
against the package doc-gnome-hig. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/549048. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
