Your message dated Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:06:41 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-electronics-devel] RFS: gtkwave 3.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #505591,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.4: extended registers have no high halves
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
505591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505591
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtkwave
Version: 3.1.13-1
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.4
Your package fails to build with the upcoming GCC 4.4. Version 4.4
has not been released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order
to find errors and give people an advance warning.
You can reproduce this problem with gcc-snapshot from unstable.
> Automatic build of gtkwave_3.1.13-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
...
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DWAVE_USE_GTK2 -I./.. -I./../.. -g
> -O2 -MT lxt2_read.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/lxt2_read.Tpo" -c -o lxt2_read.o
> lxt2_read.c; \
> then mv -f ".deps/lxt2_read.Tpo" ".deps/lxt2_read.Po"; else rm -f
> ".deps/lxt2_read.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> lxt2_read.c: In function 'lxt2_rd_iter_radix':
> lxt2_read.c:328: error: extended registers have no high halves
> make[5]: *** [lxt2_read.o] Error 1
I think there are some more errors.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:45:21AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 02:47:30PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > Could someone try to compile this package on an amd64 architecture using
> > gcc4.4, as I want to make sure that bug #505591 has been solved by
> > upstream.
>
> I can't reproduce it with 3.2.0-1 nor your 3.2.3-1 either.
> 3.2.3-1 builds with gcc-4.4 from unstable.
>
> (CC=gcc-4.4 ./configure; make)
>
>
> I can reproduce the failure with 3.1.10-1. So I guess it is fixed.
>
> Hamish
---end quoted text---
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
--- End Message ---
