Your message dated Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:19:32 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Done, no packages depend on it anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #527980,
regarding Please provide upgrade path from libphysfs-1.0-0 to libphysfs1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
527980: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527980
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libphysfs1
Version: 2.0.0-3
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Hello,
Please provide upgrade path from libphysfs-1.0-0 to libphysfs1.
In current setup replacing libphysfs-1.0-0 with libphysfs1 requires user's
manual intervention.

I believe that empty dummy package libphysfs-1.0-0 depending on libphysfs1
shall be sufficient.

Optionally, you can ask to rebuild packages having dependency
on libphysfs-1.0-0. Other option is asking debian-release team (CCed)
for rebuild and binary NMU the packages.

List of packages still depending on libphysfs-1.0-0:
 - asc
 - balder2d
 - libparagui1.1
 - libtaoframework-physfs1.0-cil
 - lincity-ng
 - love
 - netpanzer

Regards
        Artur

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
<Przewdnik> Jesteś ultranormalny. Wyjebany w kosmos.
<Przewdnik> Idealista :)
<Przewdnik> I perfekcjonista :)
                                /o mnie :)/



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Artur R. Czechowski schrieb:
> reopen 527980
> thanks
> 
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:34:15PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> I am closing it right now. rdepends does not show any package which
>> still depends on the old libphysfs-1.0-0.
> Please see a result of:
> 
> for p in balder2d libparagui1.1 lincity-ng netpanzer; do
> apt-cache show $p | grep -E 'libphysfs-1.0-0|^Version:' | sed -e "s/^/$p: /"
> done
> 
> balder2d: Version: 1.0-1
> balder2d: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), 
> libguichan-0.8.1-1, libguichan-sdl-0.8.1-1, libphysfs-1.0-0, libsdl-gfx1.2-4 
> (>= 2.0.13), libsdl-image1.2 (>= 1.2.5), libsdl-mixer1.2 (>= 1.2.6), 
> libsdl1.2debian (>= 1.2.10-1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1), python2.4 (>= 2.3.90), 
> balder2d-data
> libparagui1.1: Version: 1.1.8-3
> libparagui1.1: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libexpat1 (>= 1.95.8), libfreetype6 
> (>= 2.3.5), libgcc1, libjpeg62, libphysfs-1.0-0, libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4), 
> libsdl1.2debian (>= 1.2.10-1), libsigc++-1.2-5c2, libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1-4), 
> libtiff4, zlib1g
> lincity-ng: Version: 2.0-2
> lincity-ng: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libgl1-mesa-glx 
> | libgl1, libphysfs-1.0-0, libsdl-gfx1.2-4 (>= 2.0.13), libsdl-image1.2 (>= 
> 1.2.5), libsdl-mixer1.2 (>= 1.2.6), libsdl-ttf2.0-0, libsdl1.2debian (>= 
> 1.2.10-1), libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1), libxml2 (>= 2.6.27), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4), 
> lincity-ng-data (= 2.0-2), ttf-dejavu
> netpanzer: Version: 0.8.2-2
> netpanzer: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1-21), 
> libphysfs-1.0-0, libsdl-mixer1.2 (>= 1.2.6), libsdl1.2debian (>= 1.2.10-1), 
> libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1-4), netpanzer-data (= 0.8.2-2)
> 
> Regards
>       Artur

Sorry, this is not testing/unstable, where the specific physfs version
is available. You have to test it against testing/sid, where everything
is fine.

- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
 Patrick Matthäi
 GNU/Linux Debian Developer

E-Mail: [email protected]
        [email protected]

Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrt7VQACgkQ2XA5inpabMdw9ACfXv1vorIg/w1aCJpecWNnwblG
W4gAn1wtQ2JZraYQuNxyalFKsoPgCyvK
=k65a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to