Your message dated Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:09:03 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#561929: uzbl 0.0.0~git.20091130-2 depends on
libsoup2.4-1 (>= 2.28.2), 2.28.1 should be sufficient
has caused the Debian Bug report #561929,
regarding uzbl 0.0.0~git.20091130-2 depends on libsoup2.4-1 (>= 2.28.2), 2.28.1
should be sufficient
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
561929: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561929
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: uzbl
Version: 0.0.0~git.20091130-2
The new package depends on libsoup2.4-1 >= 2.28.2. That's ok for Debian
Unstable, but Testing still has 2.28.1-3. And Ubuntu Karmic also has
2.28.1-2. Wouldn't 2.28.1 be enough? The previous package worked fine
with it.
Please adjust the dependency.
Thanks and keep up the good work!
--
ilf [email protected]
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
-- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.0.0~git.20091130-2
ilf scrisse:
> Package: uzbl
> Version: 0.0.0~git.20091130-2
>
> The new package depends on libsoup2.4-1 >= 2.28.2. That's ok for
> Debian Unstable, but Testing still has 2.28.1-3. And Ubuntu Karmic
> also has 2.28.1-2. Wouldn't 2.28.1 be enough? The previous package
> worked fine with it.
> Please adjust the dependency.
The dependency is automatically generated at build time looking
at symbol-file coming from libraries, and using latest packages (as
supposed to be "better").
If no major bugs found, libsoup will soon migrate to testing (and uzbl
too), so no need to care.
Ubuntu has chosen not to be binary compatible with Debian, so I can't
offer help here, as they will pick the source and rebuild on their own.
Given all these, I won't force that loose dependency into official
binaries. You are anyway encouraged to pick the source/dsc and rebuild
with your stricter needing (ie. using 2.28.1-2 to build), as it should
work flawlessy.
Cheers, Luca
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org
`. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3
`- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
pgp0Y0SDiFx6f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
