Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:06:17 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #537202,
regarding zaptel-source: fails to build against 2.6.30: error: 'struct
proc_dir_entry' has no member named 'owner'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
537202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537202
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: zaptel-source
Version: 1:1.4.11~dfsg-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
It appears that the kernel developers have removed the owner field from procfs
because it is
"racy" and it is now implicitly set by other operations. The fix is to simply
remove attempts
to set the owner.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages zaptel-source depends on:
ii bzip2 1.0.5-1 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii debhelper 7.0.15 helper programs for debian/rules
ii module-assistant 0.10.11.0 tool to make module package creati
Versions of packages zaptel-source recommends:
ii zaptel 1:1.4.11~dfsg-3 zapata telephony utilities
zaptel-source suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- zaptel2/modules/zaptel/kernel/vzaphfc/vzaphfc_main.c 2008-12-03
04:20:16.000000000 -0600
+++ modules/zaptel/kernel/vzaphfc/vzaphfc_main.c 2009-07-15
19:52:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -1858,22 +1858,22 @@
sizeof(card->proc_dir_name),
"%d", card->cardnum);
card->proc_dir = proc_mkdir(card->proc_dir_name, hfc_proc_zaphfc_dir);
- card->proc_dir->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+// card->proc_dir->owner = THIS_MODULE;
card->proc_info = create_proc_read_entry(
"info", 0444, card->proc_dir,
hfc_proc_read_info, card);
- card->proc_info->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+// card->proc_info->owner = THIS_MODULE;
card->proc_fifos = create_proc_read_entry(
"fifos", 0400, card->proc_dir,
hfc_proc_read_fifos, card);
- card->proc_fifos->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+// card->proc_fifos->owner = THIS_MODULE;
card->proc_bufs = create_proc_read_entry(
"bufs", 0400, card->proc_dir,
hfc_proc_read_bufs, card);
- card->proc_bufs->owner = THIS_MODULE;
+// card->proc_bufs->owner = THIS_MODULE;
hfc_resetCard(card);
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1:1.4.11~dfsg-3+rm
http://bugs.debian.org/553083
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
