Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:50:36 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#206472: PATCH_GET=0 should be default
has caused the Debian Bug report #206472,
regarding PATCH_GET=0 should be default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
206472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=206472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: patch
Version: 2.5.9-1
Severity: wishlist
The days when people would keep trees of source control files without
working files is long gone. As such, the assumption that source
control relevant to patching is obsolute. Anyone who wants source
control can set PATCH_GET=1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tytlal 2.4.22pre10ax #4 Mon Aug 4 13:09:23 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages patch depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6-1
Re: Chip Salzenberg 2003-08-21 <e19pbbi-0005ws...@tytlal>
> The days when people would keep trees of source control files without
> working files is long gone. As such, the assumption that source
> control relevant to patching is obsolute. Anyone who wants source
> control can set PATCH_GET=1.
This was already fixed in 2.6.
Christoph
--
[email protected] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
