Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:15:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219110: libssl0.9.6: i[456]86 libraries not built -fPIC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2003 11:44:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 04 05:44:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from brown.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.14]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AGzcH-0001m3-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 05:44:57 -0600
Received: from lilwolf.fitz.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.239.222])
by brown.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AGzcC-0008TL-Cq; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:44:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libssl0.9.6: i[456]86 libraries not built -fPIC
Bcc: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 20:01:41 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libssl0.9.6
Version: 0.9.6k-1
Severity: normal
/usr/lib/i[456]86/lib{crypto,ssl}.so.0.9.6 are not built with -fPIC as
specified in policy 10.2. Policy mentions that private libraries need
not follow this rule, but since the processor specific versions are
loaded into any app that uses lib{crypto,ssl}, they're not really
private. This breaks SSL apps on my machine as I use NOELFRELOCS
enforced by PaX and thus cannot load libraries with text relocations. =)
I tried to fix this; it seems, however, that the offending object files
are the asm ones (which is why the non-processor specific libraries are
PIC) and I'm not sure what to do about that. OpenSSL 0.9.7 has PIC
libraries, so something in the build process has presumably been
updated.
Thanks in advance,
Torne
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lilwolf 2.4.22-grsec #1 Mon Oct 27 20:14:51 GMT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libssl0.9.6 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219110-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 07:17:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 00:17:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
(patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de) [134.93.144.165]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2kq1-0004V9-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:17:21 -0700
Received: from charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[134.93.226.11])
by patty.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j7A7Fa9W021878
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:15:36 +0200
Received: from [134.93.226.8] (woodstock.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de [134.93.226.8])
(authenticated bits=0)
by charlie.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP
id j7A7Fajx022731
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:15:36 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:15:36 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050331
Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#219110: libssl0.9.6: i[456]86 libraries not built -fPIC
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig30393235FC6C3A8501854308"
X-Virus-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Spam-Scanned-From: mailgate1.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 134.93.226.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig30393235FC6C3A8501854308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
libssl0.9.6 will now be removed, since libssl0.9.7 is standard in
stable/sarge. Closing this bug.
--
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
Fax: +49-6131-3922856
--------------enig30393235FC6C3A8501854308
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC+amYgeVih7XOVJcRApFlAJ9b78pJEJw1GlVCF8Xmia7iNGeKxACePBFm
vkj5v1jxorU9RkXhv7nY+OU=
=8IeU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig30393235FC6C3A8501854308--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
