Your message dated Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:52:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321612: scummvm/i386: uninstallable, depends on
non-existing libflac7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 13:05:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 06:05:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1OMl-0003GX-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 06:05:31 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E1OMj-0003ZH-Lo
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:05:29 +0200
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 15:05:29 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: scummvm/i386: uninstallable, depends on non-existing libflac7
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: scummvm
Version: 0.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
I don't know how but scummvm 0.7.1-2 in i386 depends on libflac7,
which does not exist in the archive.
As other architectures don't show this error, please fix this with a
binary upload for i386 only if possible.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Astrud - Miedo a la muerte estilo imperio (Esta alegrÃa
fuera de contexto)
Old men are fond of giving good advice to console themselves for their
inability to set a bad example.
-- La Rochefoucauld, "Maxims"
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321612-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2005 09:52:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 02:52:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from head.linpro.no [80.232.36.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E39ju-0003Nd-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:52:43 -0700
Received: from f95.linpro.no ([80.232.36.96] helo=echo.e.linpro.no)
by head.linpro.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #1 (Debian))
id 1E39js-0004A0-CC; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:52:40 +0200
Subject: Re: Bug#321612: scummvm/i386: uninstallable, depends on
non-existing libflac7
From: Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:52:40 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/)
*1E39js-0004A0-CC*zTqxZW.lLds*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
* Adeodato Sim=C3=B3
> I don't know how but scummvm 0.7.1-2 in i386 depends on libflac7,
> which does not exist in the archive.
>=20
> As other architectures don't show this error, please fix this with a
> binary upload for i386 only if possible.
I uploaded 0.7.1-2.1 to fix this a while ago, but it seems that this
bug wasn't closed automatically, for some strange reason. Anyway, the
fix was simply to recompile the package after having removed my own
home-built packages of FLAC 1.1.2 from my workstation.
Thanks for your report.
--=20
Tore Anderson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
