Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:01:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2004 14:08:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 24 06:08:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from warsl402pip2.highway.telekom.at (email04.aon.at) [195.3.96.74] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B693s-0007L6-00; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:08:52 -0800
Received: (qmail 295100 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 14:08:17 -0000
Received: from l0664p06.dipool.highway.telekom.at (HELO debian) 
([62.46.146.230]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
          by qmail7rs.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 24 Mar 2004 14:08:17 -0000
Received: from elias by debian with local (Exim 4.30)
        id 1B693J-00005C-Mo; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:08:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Elias Pschernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: anjuta: file dialog not like other programs
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.54
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:08:17 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: anjuta
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: wishlist



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers experimental
  APT policy: (501, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages anjuta depends on:
ii  g++                         4:3.3.3-2    The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc                         4:3.3.3-2    The GNU C compiler
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.16-3     Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0                 1.6.0-1      The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile0               0.2.6-3      Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0                2.4.3-1      Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0              2.4.3-2      The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0                     0.2.29-1     Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfontconfig1              2.2.2-1      generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6                2.1.7-2      FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.4-0pre1  GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4                 2.4.0.1-4    GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt1                  1.1.12-4     LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0                 2.0.1-6      Library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0                2.4.0-1      The GLib library of C routines
hi  libgnome2-0                 2.4.0-6      The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-0           2.4.0-2      A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0          2.4.2-4      The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgnomeprintui2.2-0        2.4.2-2      The GNOME 2.2 print architecture U
ii  libgnomeui-0                2.4.0.1-8    The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
hi  libgnomevfs2-0              2.4.1-5      The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnomevfs2-common         2.4.1-5      The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnutls7                  0.8.12-5     GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgtk2.0-0                 2.2.4-3      The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libjpeg62                   6b-9         The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libncurses5                 5.4-2        Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  liborbit2                   1:2.8.3-2    libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-0               1.4.0-1      Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpcre3                    4.5-1.1      Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libpopt0                    1.7-4        lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.3-4    The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtasn1-0                  0.1.2-1      Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii  libvte4                     1:0.11.10-6  Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 
ii  libxft2                     2.1.2-6      FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxml2                     2.6.7-1      GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1                 0.8.3-7      X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  make                        3.80-6       The GNU version of the "make" util
ii  xlibs                       4.3.0-7      X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-5    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

The file open dialog in Anjuta looks different than the one in most
other gtk(gnome?) applications. I have no idea if this can be fixed (maybe make 
it a user option, for those who like the Anjuta dialog).. but it
would be so much nicer to have a common file open dialog in all the apps I
use, like in Windows or KDE, and not have a different one in every app. I'm 
trying to avoid Qt apps in Gnome for this very reason. but if not even GTK apps 
have the same dialog, my only option would be to switch to KDE :|

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 239814-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 13:01:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 06:01:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E3ZAB-0006SB-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:01:31 -0700
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from rb387a.christs.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.233.144]:50841 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]:25)
        with esmtp id 1E3ZA8-0001cG-63 (Exim 4.51)
        (return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:01:28 +0100
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 155DC800E7C; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:01:01 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:01:01 +0100
From: Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing old bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

The bug that you reported against my package is over a year old and is either
tagged wontfix or unreproducible. I'm closing these bugs since there has been
no feedback on them recently.

If you feel that you still have a problem with the latest version of the
package then please do not hesitate to reopen the bug. Ensuring that you use
the new version feature of the BTS when doing so.

Cheers,

Rob
-- 
Rob Bradford - http://robster.org.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to