Your message dated Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:46:53 +1300
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#554461: udev: partitions on sd* belonging to a 
software raid are not populated
has caused the Debian Bug report #554461,
regarding base: Partitions on sd* devices after those with no partitions are 
not populated into /dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
554461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: base
Severity: important

I have four drives in the system: /dev/sda holds a standard, all-on-one 
partition plus a swap partition for the OS.

/dev/sdb and /dev/sdc are unpartitioned and are members of a software RAID5 
array that also includes /dev/sdd1. However even though the kernel shows 
sdd,sdd1 (and sdd2, which is just an extra bit of storage I want to export via 
NFS, I do *not* get any devices in /dev for sdd1 or sdd2. Only /dev/sdd is 
present, and so I cannot assemble my full array properly.

I think that this might be a bug in udev, but I can't identify and rule that 
might be blocking the creation of nodes for the sddX partitions.

Thanks

Alex

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
also sprach Neil Brown <[email protected]> [2009.12.08.1252 +1300]:
> This is not really an mdadm bug.  It is a bug with the 0.90
> metadata format.

And there is nothing we can do about it, hence closing this bug
report.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[email protected]>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to