Your message dated Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:05:57 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#570536: dpkg: please expand any-i386 and similar for
dsc file
has caused the Debian Bug report #570536,
regarding dpkg: please expand any-i386 and similar for dsc file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
570536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.5.6
User: [email protected]
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version does not any longer put
arch:any into the dsc when any arch-specific is built (#526617).
As a side effect of this "any-i386" is no longer replaced by "any",
and "any-i386" is left in dsc file. The rest of debian tools does not
cope properly with this, like
W: luajit source: unknown-architecture any-i386
W: luajit source: unknown-architecture any-amd64
Please, could you expand any-i386 and kfreebsd-any and similar lines.
Thanks
Petr
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Petr!
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 20:17:43 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.15.5.6
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: kfreebsd
> the current version does not any longer put
> arch:any into the dsc when any arch-specific is built (#526617).
>
> As a side effect of this "any-i386" is no longer replaced by "any",
> and "any-i386" is left in dsc file. The rest of debian tools does
> not cope properly with this, like
>
> W: luajit source: unknown-architecture any-i386
> W: luajit source: unknown-architecture any-amd64
>
> Please, could you expand any-i386 and kfreebsd-any and similar lines.
That's on purpose, if we expanded them then the source would need to
be rebuilt whenever a new architecture was added to dpkg itself, which
kind of defeats the purpose of having the wildcards to avoid needing
to enumerate the supported architectures.
I think right now the only missing piece in Debian is some of the
build daemons which need to be updated to the latest version. The
lintian warning is just there to notify that policy does not yet allow
for this. But there's already a proposal under consideration
(#530687).
So I'm closing this, as the current behaviour is not going to be
changed.
thanks,
guillem
--- End Message ---
