Your message dated Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:41:45 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package rpmstrap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #388542,
regarding rpmstrap violates FHS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
388542: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388542
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rpmstrap
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to the FHS [0], architecture independent data must reside in
/usr/share. Since rpmstrat is a collection of shell script snippets,
/usr/lib is the wrong place for them.
Regards,
- -Roberto
[0]
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREARCHITECTUREINDEPENDENTDATA
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-miami-16sarge1
Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages rpmstrap depends on:
ii rpm 4.0.4-31 Red Hat package manager
ii wget 1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFEgsP5SXWIKfIlGQRAsM6AKCX9ySGWxzXJN5Ct3Rb0jPDl3QuggCfes+S
PgOpiLskMrhzFyQxf0mLbm4=
=NsAl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.5.2-2+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/388542 in Debian BTS
against the package rpmstrap. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/443384. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
