Your message dated Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:41:45 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package rpmstrap has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #379779,
regarding regression testing?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
379779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rpmstrap
Version: 0.5.2-2
Hi,
I think rpmstrap really needs some regression testing. debootstrap
currently undergoes a lot of regression testing, and that's why it's
achieving its current high quality standard.
In the current form, I've had
SUCCESS centos4
SUCCESS heidelberg
SUCCESS mandriva10
SUCCESS sl304
FAIL centos3 --apparently genuinely fails
FAIL pdk -- needs some special command-line parameter
... and I stopped here
Something like the following would work:
#!/bin/bash
# run the test!
# directory structure
# result/run-test.sh: this file
# result/summary.txt: summary
# work/ : chroots
set -ex
[ `id -u` = 0 ]
: > summary.txt
mkdir ../work
for A in /usr/lib/rpmstrap/scripts/*; do
echo Building ${A#/usr/lib/rpmstrap/scripts/}
DIST=${A#/usr/lib/rpmstrap/scripts/}
mkdir "../work/${DIST}"
( cd "../work/${DIST}";
if rpmstrap --verbose "${DIST}" ./; then
echo "SUCCESS ${DIST}" >> ../../result/summary.txt
else
echo "FAIL ${DIST}" >> ../../result/summary.txt
fi
) 2>&1 | tee log.${DIST}
done
regards,
junichi
--
dan...@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.5.2-2+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/379779 in Debian BTS
against the package rpmstrap. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/443384. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
